In
most countries, cultural institutions are heavily supported by public
funds. In the literature, this is explained by expected externalities,
meaning that not only users, but also non-users benefit from the
existence of cultural institutions. However, there is little knowledge
about what these externalities consist of, and how they relate to the
characteristics of the supply. The main aim of this study is to
investigate the perceived benefits of theatres serving the local
community, and whether the type of theatre matters. Using data from a
large-scale survey conducted in Denmark in the spring of 2020, we find
that the type of theatre has a significant impact on the values
perceived by the users, while non-users show no preferences for the
types of theatre located in the municipality. Therefore, we conclude
that non-users have little understanding of the externalities provided,
and the type of supply is of no consequence for non-users’ valuation.
KEYWORDS: Performing arts, non-market benefits, externalities, attractivness, non users, willingness-to-pay